« August 2005 | Main | October 2005 »

September 28, 2005

The Difference Between Airplanes And Women

1. Airplanes usually kill you quickly - a woman takes her time.

2. Airplanes can be turned on by a flick of a switch.

3. Airplanes don't get mad if you do a "touch and go."

4. Airplanes don't object to a preflight inspection.

5. Airplanes come with manuals to explain their operation.

6. Airplanes have strict weight and balance limitations.

7. Airplanes can be flown any time of the month.

8. Airplanes don't come with in-laws.

9. Airplanes don't care about how many other airplanes you've flown before.

10. Airplanes and pilots both arrive at the same time.

11. Airplanes don't mind if you look at other airplanes.

12. Airplanes don't mind if you buy airplane magazines.

13. Airplanes expect to be tied down.

14. Airplanes don't comment on your piloting skills.

15. Airplanes don't whine unless something is really wrong.

However, when airplanes go quiet, just like women, it's usually not good.

- Joatmoaf -

September 28, 2005 at 06:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack

September 27, 2005

State Of The Union Speech: From A Compassionate Conservative Point Of View


My Fellow Americans:

As you all know, the defeat of the Iraqi regime has been completed.
Since congress does not want to spend any more money on this war, our mission in Iraq is complete.
This morning I gave the order for a complete removal of all American forces from Iraq.
This action will be complete within 30 days. It is now time to begin the reckoning.

Before me, I have two lists. One list contains the names of countries which have stood by our side during the Iraq conflict. This list is short. The United Kingdom, Spain, Bulgaria, Australia, and Poland are some of the countries listed there.

The other list contains everyone not on the first list. Most of the world's nations are on that list. My press secretary will be distributing copies of both lists later this evening.

Let me start by saying that effective immediately, foreign aid to those nations on List 2 ceases
immediately and indefinitely. The money saved during the first year alone will pretty much pay for the costs of the Iraqi war.
The American people are no longer going to pour money into third world Hell-holes and watch those government leaders grow fat on corruption.

Need help with a famine? Wrestling with an epidemic? Call France.

In the future, together with Congress, I will work to redirect this money toward solving the vexing social problems we still have at home. On that note, a word to terrorist organizations. Screw with us and we will hunt you down and eliminate you and all your friends from the face of the earth.

Thirsting for a gutsy country to terrorize? Try France, or maybe China. I am ordering the immediate severing of diplomatic relations with France, Germany, and Russia. Thanks for all your help, comrades. We are retiring from NATO as well. Bon chance, mes amis.

I have instructed the Mayor of New York City to begin towing the many UN diplomatic vehicles located in Manhattan with more than two unpaid parking tickets to sites where those vehicles will be stripped, shredded and crushed. I don't care about whatever treaty pertains to this. You creeps have tens of thousands of unpaid tickets. Pay those tickets tomorrow or watch your precious Benzes, Beamers and limos be turned over to some of the finest chop shops in the world. I love New York .

A special note to our neighbors. Canada is on List 2. Since we are likely to be seeing a lot more of each other, you folks might want to try not pissing us off for a change.

Mexico is also on List 2. President Fox and his entire corrupt government really need an attitude
adjustment. I will have a couple extra tank and infantry divisions sitting around. Guess where I am going to put em? Yep, border security. So start doing something with your oil.

Oh, by the way, the United States is abrogating the NAFTA treaty - starting now.

We are tired of the one-way highway. Immediately, we'll be drilling for oil in Alaska - which will take care of this country's oil needs for decades to come. If you're an environmentalist who opposes this decision,
I refer you to List 2 above: pick a country and move there. They care.

It is time for America to focus on its own welfare and its own citizens. Some will accuse us of isolationism. I answer them by saying, "darn tootin."

Nearly a century of trying to help folks live a decent life around the world has only earned us the undying enmity of just about everyone on the planet. It is time to eliminate hunger in America. It is time to eliminate homelessness in America. To the nations on List 1, a final thought. Thanks guys. We owe you and we won't forget.

To the nations on List 2, a final thought: You might want to learn to speak Arabic.

God bless America. Thank you and good night.

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading it in English,
thank a soldier.

EDITORS NOTE: An un-disclosed source assures me that this speech is legitimate. It was allegedly hacked from from George Bushes I-Pod while he and Dick Cheney were discussing what country to invade next. Don`t ask who the source is, just atke my word that this speech is legitimate.
It was meticulously Copy and Pasted by me personally.


- Joatmoaf -

September 27, 2005 at 10:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack

September 26, 2005

Dubya Dubya Eye Eye Eye

President Bush and Rumsfeld are sitting at a bar...

A Conservative walks in and asks the bartender, "isn`t that Bush and Rumsfeld over there?"

The bartender replies, "Yep, that`s them."

The Conservativer walks over and says, "Wow, this is a real honor. What are you guys doing in here?"

Bush says, "We`re planning WW III."

The Conservative says,"Really? What`s going to happen?"

Bush says, "Well, we`re going to kill 140 million muslims and one blonde with big boobs."

The Conservative exclaimed, "A blonde with big boobs? Why kill a blonde with big boobs?"

Bush turns to Rumsfeld and says, "See, I told you no one CARES about the 140 million muslims."


.......................................................................................................................................................


President Bush and Rumsfeld are sitting in a bar...

A Liberal walks in and asks the bartender, "Isn`t that Bush and Rumsfeld over there?"

The bartender says, "Yep, that`s them."

So the Liberal walks over and says, "Wow, The Prince of Evil and his Minion. What are you guys doing in here?"

Bush says, "We`re planning WW III."

The Liberal says, "Really? I KNEW it. What`s going to happen?"

Bush says, "Well, we`re going to kill 140 million muslims and one blonde with big boobs."

The Liberal exclaimed, "A blonde with big boobs? You EVIL crook. Why kill a blonde with big boobs?"

Bush turns to Rumsfeld and says, "See, I told you no one CARES about 140 million muslims."


Yes, I know it's an old joke, but I added a twist to it. A twist to meet the times, if you will, and yet, in the ideological sense it true.
Not about the 140 million muslims of course, but about the way the whole liberal establishment views anything that even remotely relates to Bush.

The original joke is just plain funny in its own right (So sue me. I have a twisted sense of humor), but the double sided joke I just edited is funny because it reveals a fatal flaw in hardcore liberal thinking that they just won`t see.

The result is that their hatred of Bush blinds them to the realities of the times.
You see, it's not the programs Bush pushes or the Laws that he passes that they have a real problem with.
No, it`s just the fact that it is Bush pushing the programs or passing the Laws that get them in an uproar. Otherwise, they're OK with it.

Just because I don`t post often doesn`t mean I haven't been paying attention. It's just that, when I watch TV news or read a paper, it's more of the same.
No real, concrete, VALID charges or complaints, just heresay and innuendo coupled with the lies of omission that the MSN is famous for, all to guide the viewer or reader to only one inescapable conclusion.

If it's bad, it's Bushes fault. If it's good, put it in Section Z, Page 43.

The Media has worked hard to build up an image of Bush that they can sell to the public.

The image is this: Bungling idiot / Evil genius.
Sorry, one or the other, but you can`t have both. Which is he?

The bungling slapsitck clown that's forever portrayed of him in the Media?
The Evil Genius, that personally controls every Big Buisnes deal and every Military operation, all while planning world conquest?

Which is it News People? You can`t have it both ways, so quit lying to the public through your hatred of him.
I personally don`t care what some millionaire newsman or woman, or some millionaire actor thinks about a President.

Why is their opinion more valid than mine or anyone elses?
It isn`t, so they should do like the rest of us REAL people do. Talk amongst friends. Get a website. Go to functions. Complain, and VOTE, but NOT grandstand on someone else dime while trying to shove their twisted ideology down our throats.

They're not smarter than the people, they`re not wiser than us, they`re not more educated or more informed, and they`re certainly not BETTER than us.
If they were, they wouldn`t be actors or newspeople now, would they?

Over and over again I read that Bush is either, A. a moron, or B. an evil genius, and I wonder why some of the big name bloggers haven`t called the Media out on this obvious conflict of convenience and seriously put the screws to them.

I also wonder just how big would someones brain have to be in order to control all of the things Bush has been accused of controlling?

Let`s see. Military domination. Economic domination. Racial dominatin. Cultural domination. Spiritual domination. I`m sure that`s just the tip of the iceburg, but you get the idea.

Anyone who could pull that off would need a brain so large they`d have to travel by forklift.
How could he hold his head up without his neck snapping like a dry twig?
More things to ponder on.

The Liberal Left is cutting their own throats, but as is their nature they`re too stubborn to realize it, too stubborn know that times change and so do ideals, and therefore they are too stubborn to make a quick clean cut. The Liberal Left will die a slow, painful, bitter, self inflicted death.

So you see, the joke is true in BOTH cases and therefore funnier.
The punch line is funny in the Conservatives case because he didn`t care for the muslims anyway, and it`s funnier in the Liberals case because...HE DIDN`T EITHER!

Get it?

- Joatmoaf -


September 26, 2005 at 12:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

September 25, 2005

The Joys Of Spam

Ah Spam, not Hormel brand Spam but the weblog, e-mail and general internet kind.
I hate spam and I seem to get a lot every once in a while. It never comes in a steady stream, 2 or 3 or 20 a day, every day. No, it comes in spurts.
I can go a month without any and then I get 10 or 15 a day, so I got to thinking, "What`s the pattern?"

I`ve said before that everything has some kind of pattern to it, a central identifier, or critical link that ties it together in a way that allows you to examine the whole. So what`s the pattern on this sporadic spam-alanche?

It turns out there`s a simple explaination for it - Weblogs! Not yours or mine or any REAL weblog, but weblogs that spammers themselves have set up.

Spammers, corporations, marketing companies or more likely, just some loser scam artist who`s too lazy or stupid to find a real job.

What they do is, they start a weblog, tell all their spammer friends, and then they do a trackback ping to your, or my site on some supposedly forgotten topic, then their spammer loser friends visit their site, look at the "Topics" then they click the conveniently provided link and begin dropping Spam Bombs.

The pattern is the same, Always.

You own a blog and are a little too busy to check and clean up comments on a constant basis -

They check up on your diligence first by posting one comment, usually in some old archives. The comment may be a spam link, but not always. It`s more often either a general comment of agreement or, more likely, a non-sensical comment. The point is that it`s only a test comment, posted to see if your comments are accessable to spammers and to see if you`re paying attention.
The spammer comes back within the next 24 hours and if the comment is still there, they post a "Topic" about your site on their blog. After that, every spammer in the known universe will shortly know who to spam.

My most recent "Spam Scout" came in this comment. The spam scout left it but when he came back to check he didn`t actually bother to see if it was changed, he only looked at the list of comments on the left.
Had he bothered to look, he would have noticed that what he had written is not the same as what is written now.

I changed it and banned him the same day and on the same day I get this Trackback ping which is, in my opinion, totally non-sensical because it is non-comparative to anything except my site.

The same day, I start getting spam, so I go check out this "Weblog" to see what it`s about.
What do I find? Trackback pings to various and sundry websites, with short comments but relatively no comparative commentary.
Click the "Main" tab and look at the "Topics". There are no topics just links to other sites posted in a sentence.
Notice how the "Topic" sentences all have the same general air about them. Standard Issue Spam Comment type sentences. I wouldn`t doubt that it`s nothing more than a 'Bot run blog, with the only human contribution being the monthly payments.

This is not the only such site, it`s just the one that caused me to be sure that I`m right about this. It`s happened many times before and the M.O. is always the same as this, that`s why I waited until now, I wanted to be sure.

Whoever you folks are with websites like that, I don`t want your Trackbacks, and if you do ping me, I`ll delete it and ban your IP.

Also, spammers be warned, I`ve been compiling a list of every spam comment, where it came from (IP),
fake e-mail addresses and most importantly, the messeges themselves.

You might think that you`re invisible and anonomous because of the nature of the internet but you`d be wrong. I`ve already tracked down and identified 3 "anonomous" spammers and the rest of you aren`t far behind.

The thing is, this is MY site, not some little lazy, loser spammers. NOT Propecia's, Viagra's, or some porn site`s weblog. Any advertising done on this site will be approved be me and NO advertising will be done on this site without my being PAID!

Since you retarded losers don`t see any advertising on my sidebars it probably occured to you that I don`t WANT advertising, so who the hell do you losers think you are?

Well, that`s O.K. Eat, Drink and Be Merry, because the Piper WILL be paid!

I`ve been compiling this spammer list from a year and a half ago. Since I don`t delete anything without saving the info first I`ve got everything I need.
When time permits I`ve been linking spammer to IP to product with the ultimate goal of proving that it`s a corporate marketing scheme for the various different products being hawked as spam.
Once I have enough verifyable evidence of corporate management, I intend to sue.
Actually, the more the merrier. A class action lawsuit against those responsible for spam is way overdue anyway.

We bloggers are the ones who pay the price for this scam, not the IPs, not our server sites and certainly not the companies who's products are continually being hawked on our sites for free.
We have to spend time and effort to scan comments, then delete and ban offending spam, and we are the ones who have to put the screws down so tight on comment settings that it`s becoming more trouble than it`s worth for a reader to even post a comment anymore.

I did not get this site so that some fat lazy bastard can make free money off of it while I have to clean up after him.
It`s stealing. They are stealing my bandwidth to sell their products and they think there`s nothing I (or you) can do about it.
It`s also a denial of service, especially when it gets to the point that your weblog settings are totally screwed up because you haven`t had time to do anything but clean up and try to prevent spam.
It`s also denial of service when they get so bad that it causes you to either close comments altogether or tweek your settings to such an extent that readers get dis-interested due to the inability to post a comment.

There are a LOT of blogs that I don`t go to much anymore simply because I have to run the gauntlet to post a comment.
FYI comments are where the action is, not the topic itself. If you can`t have comments you might as well just start sending "Letters To The Editor" of your local paper. You`ll get the same results.

This blog was started from some comments over at ScrappleFace.
The Great Cheeto Eater had declared that some (not mine) comments were far to long and off topic and were hogging his bandwidth and that some commenters (again not me) could start their own blog since they had so much off topic stuff to say, and then he supplied links on how to start a blog.

The people from the comment section of ScrappleFace were the first ones to come here regularly and from those same commenters a (not so) shy young lady was coaxed into trying her hand at posting "Topics" and now she keeps her own Villianous Company and has become a force to be reconned with.

Spammers and Marketing people, I`m tired of you intruding on my turf. I`m tired of you stealing from me. I`m tired of your cavalier attitudes about how much trouble you cause me just so you can try to get a sale.

I`ve been documenting, compiling, tracking and linking together all the spam you`ve been sending my way. It`s already making a coherent picture of your active involvement.
Once this tapistry is woven together, I`m coming after you to make you pay, IN CASH MONEY!

Since the All Mighty Dollar is the only thing you seem to understand, the All Mighty Dollar is what I`m going to take away from you.

Can you say, "Lawsuit"? Better yet, can you say, "Class Action Lawsuit"?


- Joatmoaf -


September 25, 2005 at 09:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (7)

September 19, 2005

Enough Already!!!

I hate Hurricanes. What some little one legged upstart pseudo demi-god has against Key West I`ll never know, but it`s come to the point where I`m about ready to declare War on the Mayan god, Huracan.

I have no idea why every little tropical, depression, storm or hurricane in existance simply must drop by Key West and say Hello, but they ain`t welcome anymore.

Name a hurricane that hit Florida and it probably hit Key West first and if it hit the Gulf states, chances are it hit Key West too.
If it`s War they want, it`s War they`re gonna get except I`m not going to play around with it like they did in the '60s and '70s. I`m going to get serious.

From 1962 to 1983 the US Government experimented with hurricane control under Project Stormfury.

The core idea was that the silver iodide would cause supercooled water in the storm to freeze, disrupting the inner structure of the hurricane. In the 1980s, it was shown that most hurricanes do not contain enough supercooled water for cloud seeding to be effective. Additionally, researchers found that unseeded hurricanes often undergo the same structural changes that were expected from seeded hurricanes. This finding called Stormfury's successes into question, as the changes reported now had a natural explanation.

Well Woop Ti Do, I don`t need to be a Meterologist to know how to kill a Hurricane.
I figure that a well placed Thermonuclear Warhead on the order of say, Tsar Bomba ought to do the trick quite nicely and hopefully bring some excellent sunsets for a few days.

I`m pretty sure that after 10 or 15 of these entirely defensive attacks, that Mayan freak Huracan will get the hint and find someone else to "visit."

Now I have hours of work to do in order to get prepared for Rita. We never seem to get a chance to breath. First Dennis then Katrina, now Rita and I`ve forgotten the names of almost all of the ones previously.

Oh well, I`ll ride Rita out in the I Love Jet Noise Imperial Mobile Home and Command Post.
If it gets too bad I can always shack up on the government dime at the base.


UPDATE: Liberal Larry has discovered that Rita is just another Evil Plan by George Bush and Halliburton to wipe out the Gay Community in Key West.
Read it Here.

- Joatmoaf -


September 19, 2005 at 05:22 PM | Permalink | Comments (13) | TrackBack

September 14, 2005

On This Day...

I can`t believe I almost forgot one of the most significant anniversaries in American History.

On This Day...September 14, 1814

Francis Scott Key composes the lyrics to the Star Spangled Banner.


A year and a half ago I posted a piece about Isaac Azimov's feelings on this topic. Azimov was always one of my favorite authors, and not just for his science fiction writing. He could write about almost anything and often did. He wrote some excellent detective stories and humor and was a favorite of mine since about the time I started reading.

When I was about 9 years old my dad bought a huge encyclopedia set. There were 24 leather bound books of about 400 pages each going from A to Z, and it came with 24 leather bound books of "stories". The whole thing came in a Cherry book table about the size of a coffee table on steroids and it probably weighed 250 lbs.
I was a voracious reader and YES, I actually read the encyclopedias, but what got my interest was the books of "stories".
Here`s where I learned of Gilgamesh, Atlantis, Ancient Rome and Egypt. I walk with dinosaurs and flew through the stars with the authors from the Golden Age of science fiction.
From those books is where I learned the potential of art, science, history and imagination. They weren`t just fables or myths, although myths and fables were well represented in those pages. No, those books were also interspersed with history, science, facts and theoretical speculation.
They had everything my young mind needed to keep me interested, and from those books is where I first read a short "Space Opera" science fiction story by Isaac Azimov and loved his writing ever since.

Without further ado, in his own words, what Isaac Azimov thought of the Star Spangled Banner.

I have a weakness--I am crazy, absolutely nuts, about our national anthem.
The words are difficult and the tune is almost impossible, but frequently when I'm taking a shower I sing it with as much power and emotion as I can. It shakes me up every time.

I was once asked to speak at a luncheon. Taking my life in my hands, I announced I was going to sing our national anthem--all four stanzas.

This was greeted with loud groans. One man closed the door to the kitchen, where the noise of dishes and cutlery was loud and distracting. "Thanks, Herb," I said.

"That's all right," he said. "It was at the request of the kitchen staff."

I explained the background of the anthem and then sang all four stanzas.

Let me tell you, those people had never heard it before--or had never really listened. I got a standing ovation. But it was not me; it was the anthem.

More recently, while conducting a seminar, I told my students the story of the anthem and sang all four stanzas. Again there was a wild ovation and prolonged applause. And again, it was the anthem and not me.

So now let me tell you how it came to be written.

In 1812, the United States went to war with Great Britain, primarily over freedom of the seas. We were in the right. For two years, we held off the British, even though we were still a rather weak country. Great Britain was in a life and death struggle with Napoleon. In fact, just as the United States declared war, Napoleon marched off to invade Russia. If he won, as everyone expected, he would control Europe, and Great Britain would be isolated. It was no time for her to be involved in an American war.

At first, our seamen proved better than the British. After we won a battle on Lake Erie in 1813, the American commander, Oliver Hazard Perry, sent the message "We have met the enemy and they are ours." However, the weight of the British navy beat down our ships eventually. New England, hard-hit by a tightening blockade, threatened secession.

Meanwhile, Napoleon was beaten in Russia and in 1814 was forced to abdicate. Great Britain now turned its attention to the United States, launching a three-pronged attack. The northern prong was to come down Lake Champlain toward New York and seize parts of New England. The southern prong was to go up the Mississippi, take New Orleans and paralyze the west. The central prong was to head for the mid-Atlantic states and then attack Baltimore, the greatest port south of New York. If Baltimore was taken, the nation, which still hugged the Atlantic coast, could be split in two. The fate of the United States, then, rested to a large extent on the success or failure of the central prong.

The British reached the American coast, and on August 24, 1814, took Washington, D. C. Then they moved up the Chesapeake Bay toward Baltimore. On September 12, they arrived and found 1000 men in Fort McHenry, whose guns controlled the harbor. If the British wished to take Baltimore, they would have to take the fort.

On one of the British ships was an aged physician, William Beanes, who had been arrested in Maryland and brought along as a prisoner. Francis Scott Key, a lawyer and friend of the physician, had come to the ship to negotiate his release. The British captain was willing, but the two Americans would have to wait. It was now the night of September 13, and the bombardment of Fort McHenry was about to start.

As twilight deepened, Key and Beanes saw the American flag flying over Fort McHenry. Through the night, they heard bombs bursting and saw the red glare of rockets. They knew the fort was resisting and the American flag was still flying. But toward morning the bombardment ceased, and a dread silence fell. Either Fort McHenry had surrendered and the British flag flew above it, or the bombardment had failed and the American flag still flew.

As dawn began to brighten the eastern sky, Key and Beanes stared out at the fort, tyring to see which flag flew over it. He and the physician must have asked each other over and over, "Can you see the flag?"

After it was all finished, Key wrote a four stanza poem telling the events of the night. Called "The Defence of Fort M'Henry," it was published in newspapers and swept the nation. Someone noted that the words fit an old English tune called "To Anacreon in Heaven" --a difficult melody with an uncomfortably large vocal range. For obvious reasons, Key's work became known as "The Star Spangled Banner," and in 1931 Congress declared it the official anthem of the United States.

Now that you know the story, here are the words. Presumably, the old doctor is speaking. This is what he asks Key


Oh! say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?
And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
Oh! say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

"Ramparts," in case you don't know, are the protective walls or other elevations that surround a fort. The first stanza asks a question. The second gives an answer


On the shore, dimly seen thro' the mist of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep.
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream
'Tis the star-spangled banner. Oh! long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

"The towering steep" is again, the ramparts. The bombardment has failed, and the British can do nothing more but sail away, their mission a failure.

In the third stanza, I feel Key allows himself to gloat over the American triumph. In the aftermath of the bombardment, Key probably was in no mood to act otherwise.

During World War II, when the British were our staunchest allies, this third stanza was not sung. However, I know it, so here it is


And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footstep's pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

The fourth stanza, a pious hope for the future, should be sung more slowly than the other three and with even deeper feeling.


Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war's desolation,
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the Heav'n - rescued land
Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just,
And this be our motto--"In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

I hope you will look at the national anthem with new eyes. Listen to it, the next time you have a chance, with new ears.

And don't let them ever take it away.

Isaac Asimov
March 1991

- Joatmoaf -

September 14, 2005 at 07:50 PM | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack

September 13, 2005

Funny Or Not...

THIS isn`t very funny, especially if you`re a pilot.
The pilot is minding his own buisness while trying to take off when an Al Quaida Bird suicide attacks his aircraft by flying into the intake.
When I heard the pilot call, "Eject! Eject! Eject!, I couldn`t help but think of Bill Whittle with the blog of the same name.


I found something which I think is hilarious.
I know, I know, after you hear it (it`s an MP3) you`re going to say I`m mean and heartless, and call me a compassionless, insensitive, knuckle dragging Conservative, but I bet you laugh at it too.
Here It Is


Last, for those of you who don`t know, the song "Taps" which is played at "lights out" actually has words to it.
Here They Are


- Joatmoaf -

September 13, 2005 at 08:33 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack