« Bringing It On® | Main | More Moving Observations »
July 05, 2004
Confusing Freedom With License
Michael Moore is an idiot. He has a typically self-indulgent essay in Sunday's LA Times (wise choice - it makes a good trashcan liner or fish wrap: I can't see what else it might be good for):
As a young boy, I loved the American flag. I'd lead my younger sisters in patriotic parades up and down the sidewalk, waving the flag, blowing a whistle and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance over and over until my sisters begged me to let them go back to their Easy-Bake Oven.
I loved singing the national anthem. I won an essay contest on "What the Flag Means to Me." I decorated my bicycle with little American flags for a Fourth of July parade and won a prize for that too. I became an Eagle Scout and proudly promised to do my duty to God and country. And every year I asked to be the one who planted the flag on the grave of my uncle, a paratrooper who was killed in World War II. I was taught to admire his sacrifice, and I hoped to grow up and do my part, as he had, to keep us free.
But, in high school, things changed. Nine boys from my school came back home from Vietnam in boxes. Draped over each coffin was the American flag. I knew that they also had made a sacrifice. But their sacrifice wasn't for their country: They were sent to die by men who lied to them. Those men — presidents, senators, government officials — wrapped themselves in the flag too, hoping that their lies would never be questioned, never be discovered. They wrapped themselves in the very flag that was placed on the coffins of my friends and neighbors. I stopped singing the national anthem at football games, and I stopped putting out the flag.
I realize now I never should have stopped.
I wish I'd stopped reading at this point, but it was a bit like watching a train wreck. There's a certain morbid fascination to watching something disturbing. I knew it was pointless, but somehow I felt compelled to see what asinine argument Moore would come up with this time. He didn't let me down.
The Master of Illogic has decided (I realize this is a shock) that America is a Dismal Failure and it is quite likely the fault of the Bush administration. To prove this stunningly original hypothesis, Mr. Moore has assembled a penetrating set of questions. The answers are intended to harrow our immortal souls and cause the scales to fall from our eyes, allowing us to see Mr. Moore's America: a latter-day Whore of Babylon headed for eternal damnation at warp speed.
The answers to Mr. Moore's questions, as usual, are not what he would have us believe:
Are you proud that one in six children lives in poverty in America?
First of all, it is the responsibility of parents to provide for their children. The primary reason so many children grow up in poverty is simple: children born to single mothers have lower incomes than children born to married parents. Basic arithmetic reveals the cause: one income is (not surprisingly) generally lower than two combined. The decline of the nuclear family has been responsible for more child poverty than all other factors combined. Numerous government and private programs exist to assist parents of poor children. Americans have more opportunities than any parents anywhere on earth. That is indeed something to be proud of.
Are you proud that 40 million adult Americans are functional illiterates?
America has one of the best free public school systems on the planet. It costs nothing to attend. If you cannot read, there are tutoring programs available to help you catch up. There are free public libraries in every city and town. If you turn on any TV, ads literally beg you to learn to read and offer help if you cannot read, even if you are an adult. Where is the excuse not to learn to read?
Are you proud that the bulk of the jobs being created these days are low- and minimum-wage jobs?
As usual, Mr. Moore offers no proof for this statement; however, this is irrelevant as low- and minimum-wage jobs are not permanent jobs. Labor department statistics show that workers quickly move from these jobs to higher-paid jobs. These are entry-level jobs.
Are you proud of asking your fellow Americans to live on $5.15 an hour?
First of all, I do not recall having asked anyone to live on minimum wage. It would be unwise to plan on living out the rest of one's life at a minimum wage job - this betrays a disturbing lack of ambition. A recent survey showed that 63% of workers earning minimum wage were earning more money within one year. It is not a "living wage" - it is a temporary or starting wage for the vast majority of workers.
Are you proud that, according to a National Geographic Society survey, 85% of young adult Americans cannot find Iraq on the map (and 11% cannot find the United States!)?
Why would it be my responsibility to show them where Iraq is on a map? Again, this information is available on the Internet, at any public library, in an Atlas, on a globe, or in an encyclopedia. This is a silly question. Mr. Moore has too much time on his hands.
Are you proud that the rest of the world, which poured out its heart to us after Sept. 11, now looks at us with disdain and disgust?
Mr. Moore confuses sympathy with approval and genuine desire to help. We had the first after September 11th. We never had the second - how could we lose what we never possessed?
Are you proud that nearly 3 billion people on this planet do not have access to clean drinking water when we have the resources and technology to remedy this immediately?
When did it become the responsibility of the US to provide clean drinking water to the entire planet, assuming we could achieve such a thing?
Are you proud of the fact that our president sent our soldiers off to a war that had nothing to do with the self-defense of this country?
Are you proud of the fact that 3 years after September 11th, you are still doing everything you can to cover up the links between Iraq and al-Qaida?
Mr. Moore believes that "these things represent what it means to be an American these days" and that, not having done well enough according to his standards, America should "hang its head in shame".
I believe Mr. Moore has confused freedom with license. He thinks he ought to be able to say whatever he wishes (regardless of whether it is true), without having to endure the slings and arrows of dissenting speech in return. When he is criticized for his libelous falsehoods, he cries out that he is being muzzled. In reality, he is simply being called upon to defend his statements. This is called the marketplace of ideas: freedom of speech. It is (unfortunately for Mr. Moore) a two-way street.
In America, Mr. Moore has the freedom to be wrong. Others are free to point out his lies, and even to call him an ass.
Freedom is sometimes an uncomfortable commodity.
- Cassandra
July 5, 2004 at 04:45 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452b19169e200d83461aa5a69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Confusing Freedom With License:
Comments
Ah, let me add unto the Michael Mooreon take on Bush Bashing. Lessee, the DOE was created under Johnson. Yep, Bush was certainly responsible for that.
And all those welfare and single moms are certainly his fault...you'd think Clinton and Washington were in competition for the title 'Father of our Country' and that Bush enacted welfare to cover his sins.
And of course, his 'kitty litter' documentary. 'Nuff said. And he only let his sisters go back to their Easy Bake ovens so they could bake him MOORE stuff to eat and when he quit marching was when he got fat and fat headed.
Posted by: LA Femme Crickita at Jul 5, 2004 6:57:30 AM
What I can't figure out is why Disney has not sued him for lying about the distribution history of his film - Disney said from Day 1 they wouldn't distribute it, yet he hyped the film by lying about Disney's "promises" to him. They have deep pockets, and they have a duty to salvage their good name.
This man will be stopped by someone with the huevos to stop his lying, and on that day he'll look like Joe McCarthy, when asked, "have you no shame, sir?"
Posted by: MathMom at Jul 5, 2004 8:26:36 AM
What I can't figure out is why Disney has not sued him for lying about the distribution history of his film - Disney said from Day 1 they wouldn't distribute it, yet he hyped the film by lying about Disney's "promises" to him. They have deep pockets, and they have a duty to salvage their good name.
This man will be stopped by someone with the huevos to stop his lying, and on that day he'll look like Joe McCarthy, when asked, "have you no shame, sir?"
Posted by: MathMom at Jul 5, 2004 8:27:09 AM
Computer acting up today. Sorry about the double post.
Posted by: MathMom at Jul 5, 2004 8:28:09 AM
Tailgunner Joe missed a trick. When he was asked "Have you no shame?" the reply should have been, "Yes, but apparently you don't."
And Mikey Moore apparently has no shame either.
Posted by: purple raider at Jul 5, 2004 10:25:12 AM
Down at the Institute we have done considerable study on the societal problems stemming from the confusion of liberty and license.
We have concluded that schools are doing a very poor job of teaching history and the intellectual philosophies of our founding fathers.
Posted by: Pile On® at Jul 5, 2004 12:46:01 PM
Michael Moore is Sean Penn's ghostwriter.
Posted by: La Femme Crickita at Jul 6, 2004 7:57:20 AM
Bravo, Cassandra! My sentiments exactly.
Posted by: Heywood at Jul 7, 2004 12:52:16 AM
Michael Moore, are you proud of the fact that you've become a multimillionaire off the blood spilled in National tragedies?
Are you proud of the fact that you charged the families of the Columbine victims to see an advance showing of your fact deficient "Bowling"..or is it "Bloviating" crockumentary and contributed NONE of your profits to them?
Are you proud of the fact that you made a complete ass of yourelf by running around all day in a tirade screaming and hurling insults at the "common and useless"minimum wage help AND your audience at Roundhouse of London, while bitching about your only making $750 a night?
[oh sure, your 'apology' was heard, as WASN'T as much as a "goodbye" or "Thank You" when you left the next day]
Are you proud of the fact that there are more against you than for you?
What's the matter, Moore? Has the President disrupted cashflow into your bank account due to his unwavering committment to do all he can to prevent more massacres on our soil?
As someone mentioned the other day...someone needs to knock Moore out only to awaken to here he has been dropped off right in the middle of the most volatile spot in Iraq to . Let's see how he survives.
(I'm sure one of the ships that transports all the HEAVY equipment could accomodate his trip.)
Posted by: C K Cat at Jul 7, 2004 2:32:37 AM
I don't begrudge moore for being a multi-millionaire as I am working to someday be a member of that club, although I will not get there via half-truths and outright lies.
I forget where I read it, but in an interview moore was taken to task for portraying himself as "Joe Six-Pack" whilst being a multi-millionaire. His response was that he was a multi-millionaire "...because multi-millions of people appreciate what I do..." (bad paraphrase, I would apologize, but since I'm quoting michael moore the fact that I've got it at least half right should be good enough. So there.)
That is the real problem. I do not appreciate any of moore's work; and haven't since before "Roger & Me", but there are untold millions who are eating his stuff up as gospel. That is where our work is. We need to be countering moore with THE FACTS, and waking people up. Everything moore has ever done has been based upon false premises. Why should his most recent op-umentary be any different?
Posted by: Heywood at Jul 8, 2004 2:24:23 AM

