« Friday Results | Main | Sexual Politics and Abu Ghraib »

May 23, 2004

The Costs of Being Wrong on WMDs

William Kristol asks some pointed questions about WMDs:

Over the last several months, ever since David Kay stepped down as head of the Iraq Survey Group and told us that "we were almost all wrong" about Saddam's arsenal, what was once a universally accepted truth (Saddam had weapons of mass destruction) became an apparently self-evident fiction (Saddam had no such weapons). It seems the whole world now agrees that Saddam rid his country of weapons stockpiles shortly after the first Gulf War ended in 1991. With respect to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), at least, there was really nothing to worry about.
But what if that judgment, too, is wrong? Just as wrong, in fact, as was the assumption that Iraqi WMD would be found quickly and easily?

Kristol has a few questions for those who believe there never were WMDs:

Continue reading...

- Cassandra


May 23, 2004 at 09:42 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452b19169e200d8353a0d1869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Costs of Being Wrong on WMDs:

Comments